Unified physics research
Super-Space Theory (SST)
a geometric–gravitonic framework for space, time, and causality
“The cosmos doesn’t push or pull — it ripples.”
In Einstein’s relativity, space–time is treated as a smooth fabric that curves. Super-Space Theory starts one step underneath that picture: it assumes that space is built from an invisible, ultra-fine grid of tiny nodes that can stretch and ripple. The equations that govern this underlying lattice are meant to describe not only what happens on cosmic scales—galaxies, black holes, expanding space—but also the strange behavior we see on microscopic, quantum scales. The familiar effects of gravity, light, particles, and even the ticking of time then emerge from the way this discrete grid moves, rather than from a perfectly smooth continuum.
In more technical terms, SST models our universe as a discrete graviton lattice (Sub-Space) embedded in a broader Super-Space. Ripple tension, graviton density (gD), and graviton frequency (gF) govern gravity, time, and motion, linked by simple identities such as gF·d = c and d = κgeo·gD⁻¹ᐟ³.
Core SST invariants
This site is meant to share Super-Space Theory (SST), spark curiosity, and invite others into the puzzle of reality. Most of what you’ll find here is explained in a more conversational way, without the weight of a full physics paper. If you are a researcher or simply want the full technical details, I encourage you to read the published SST papers linked below.
Papers & DOIs
Peer-review–ready manuscripts with DOIs; validation preprint included.
Super-Space Theory (SST) — v2
Finalized: 2025-10-04 · License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17244842
Concept DOI (all versions): 10.5281/zenodo.17154635
Empirical Validation of Super-Space Theory
Preprint · 2025-10 · Cross-regime checks (classical, bridge, quantum)
What is Super-Space Theory?
Super-Space Theory starts from the idea that space is not empty. It treats the universe as an invisible 3D grid made of tiny points that can stretch and ripple. We never see the grid itself, but we do see the patterns that move through it.
In this picture, gravity is not a mysterious “pull” acting at a distance. A mass is a stable distortion in the grid, and gravity is how that distortion sends tension through the surrounding lattice. When you drop an object, you are essentially sliding along the slope of a ripple in this grid.
The same grid can also support more organized ripples. When they move in regular, wave-like patterns, we experience them as light and electromagnetic fields. A steady flow of tension along a path looks like an electric current; the circular patterns around that flow look like a magnetic field. In SST, gravity and electromagnetism are two different ways the same underlying grid can move.
A companion validation study compares this ripple-lattice picture with laboratory, orbital, and astrophysical data. Within current precision, SST recovers the standard results in everyday (weak-field) conditions, while offering a different underlying structure for space, time, and matter.
Going deeper into SST
Under the hood, Super-Space Theory describes each “copy” of the universe—each Sub-Space—using three key quantities: graviton density (gD), graviton frequency (gF), and lattice spacing (d). These are not extra decorations; they control how fast ripples can move, how tightly the grid is packed, and how tension propagates through space.
In our Sub-Space, gF and d are linked by a simple propagation invariant, gF·d = c, so the familiar speed of light emerges from the microscopic rhythm of the lattice. The spacing d also scales with density as d ≈ κ_geo·gD⁻¹⁄³, and in everyday conditions this implies gF ∝ gD¹⁄³. Together, these relations define how the grid is built and how fast it can ripple.
Relativity vs SST in one picture
A useful way to compare General Relativity (GR) and SST is to imagine a two-dimensional canvas. GR treats the canvas as a continuous surface: you draw a circle on it, and its area and perimeter are computed with smooth geometry. SST treats the same canvas as a discrete surface—like a 4K digital tablet made of extremely fine pixels. At high resolution, the circle still looks smooth and GR’s equations work well. But if you zoom in to a coarse 16×16 grid, the circle becomes jagged, and the continuous equations no longer apply directly because the underlying structure is discrete, not smooth.
SST provides the mathematics that governs this underlying lattice, describing how geometry, tension, and vibration behave at the level of the “pixels” themselves. In the continuum limit—when you zoom out and the pixels become tiny—GR naturally emerges from SST, just as smooth geometry emerges from a high-resolution digital grid. SST is not an extension of GR; it begins from a different substrate for spacetime and asks where the discrete picture agrees with GR, where it diverges, and which experiments can tell the difference.
About Mauro
Mauro Marson is an independent researcher based in New Jersey, USA. His work on Super-Space Theory (SST) develops a compact set of lattice-based identities that recover familiar weak-field results while suggesting quantum-adjacent behavior and testable predictions.
Born and raised in Naples, Italy, Mauro has spent his career in computer science, working as a software engineer in the telecom industry, and devotes much of his free time to physics, music, and long-running questions about how reality is built.
Contact
I’m happy to hear from people who are genuinely interested in the ideas behind Super-Space Theory — especially if you:
- Work in physics, math, or engineering and want to discuss specific aspects of the model or Validation data;
- Are a student looking for a different way to think about gravity and quantum behavior;
- Have found an error, inconsistency, or interesting consequence of the equations;
- Want to support or fund further Validation work, experimental tests, or outreach related to SST.
To keep things manageable and reduce spam, I don’t publish a raw email link here. If you’d like to get in touch, please use the contact details provided in my published papers. Include a short note about who you are and what you’d like to discuss. I read everything, but I may not be able to reply to every message quickly.